AI-Powered Content Moderation and Criminal Liability: Constitutional Safeguards vs. Platform Accountability for Objectionable Content on OTT
PDF

Keywords

Criminal Liability of Intermediaries
Constitutional Due Process (Article 21)

How to Cite

Saumya Tripathi*& Kshem Dixit. (2026). AI-Powered Content Moderation and Criminal Liability: Constitutional Safeguards vs. Platform Accountability for Objectionable Content on OTT. `Cadernos De Pós-Graduação Em Direito Político E Econômico, 26(S1), 232–242. Retrieved from https://ceapress.org/index.php/cpgdpe/article/view/209

Abstract

The rise of AI-powered content moderation on Over-The-Top (OTT) platforms presents a novel and urgent constitutional dilemma at the intersection of criminal law and corporate accountability. This paper critically examines the tension between the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution and the state’s legitimate interest in preventing the dissemination of illegal content such as hate speech, obscenity, and incitement to violence through these pervasive digital mediums. Central to this conflict is the evolving standard of criminal liability for intermediaries under Section 79 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, and the IT Rules, 2021.

PDF
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.